Timmons v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
| Anfernee Timmons |
| Wal-Mart, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00344 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Terry F Moorer |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Remand Letter, Certified Docket Sheet and Order sent via Email to Circuit Court of Mobile re #9 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. Copy to Attorney Stemle. (fz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/31/2023: #1 Case reinstated in Mobile County Circuit Court) (fz).
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Remand to State Court. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 10/30/2023. Copy mailed to Attorney Stemle. (fz)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Stipulation of Facts) (Marchand, Chad)
|
|
MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 WalMart's Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab)
|
|
Filing 7
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/30/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 10/13/2023. (Attachment: #1 consent form) (mab)
|
|
Filing 6
Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Terry F. Moorer: #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Wal-Mart, Inc. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (tot)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Filing Exhibits to Defendant Walmart's Notice of Removal by Wal-Mart, Inc. re: #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - Demand for Settlement) (Marchand, Chad)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Wal-Mart, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal to State Court (Marchand, Chad)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Marchand, Chad)
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Marchand, Chad)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3266178, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Exhibit B e-filed @ Doc. #5 . (Marchand, Chad) Modified on 9/12/2023 (tot).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Timmons v. Wal-Mart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anfernee Timmons | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Charles Stemle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Keith B. Franklin |
| Represented By: | Chad Marchand |
| Represented By: | W. Pemble DeLashmet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
