Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
| Emanuel Phillips |
| City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and Tim W Barnes |
| 1:2023cv00401 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order DENYING #7 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint, filed by Emanuel Phillips, as set out. The undersigned will MODIFY the briefing schedule: re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, and Clint Harrell's Motion to Dismiss filed by Heather Davis, City of Satsuma, Clint Harrell. Plaintiff's brief in response must be filed and served by NLT 12/28/2023. Defendants' brief in reply must be filed and served by NLT 1/5/2024. Motion to be taken under submission on 1/6/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 12/18/2023. (meh)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint. Motion no longer referred to Judge DuBose. Motion now referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson. (meh) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint, filed by Emanuel Phillips. (Muns, James Adam) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint. Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Setting Briefing Deadlines re: #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by City of Satsuma, Heather Davis and Clint Harrell. District Judge referred said motion to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for appropriate action. See S.D. Ala. GenLR 72; (11/14/2023 elec. ref.). Plaintiff's brief in response to said motion, if any, must be filed and served no later than 12/7/2023. Defendants' brief(s) in reply to the response, if any, must be filed and served no later than 12/18/2023. Motion to be taken under submission 12/19/2023. Except as permitted by the Court's Local Rules, e.g., S.D. Ala. CivLR 7(f)(3), no other briefing or submissions addressing the subject motion may be filed without leave of the Court for good cause shown. Should the Court determine oral argument would be beneficial, a hearing will be set by separate order. Otherwise, this motion is being submitted without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); S.D. Ala. CivLR 7(h) ("Oral argument requests must contain specific reasons why oral argument would be helpful."). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/16/2023. (pdo)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Bradford Reasonover on behalf of City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell (Reasonover, Robert) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, and Clint Harrell's Motion to Dismiss filed by City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell. (Redditt, Mark) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, and Clint Harrell's Motion to Dismiss. Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson. (meh) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Tim W Barnes, City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (meh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Emanuel Phillips (Muns, James Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-3291142, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Plaintiffs. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 1/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hernandez, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
