Dodd v. Pruco Life Insurance Company
| Patricia H. Dodd |
| Pruco Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv00408 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Pruco Life Insurance Company (Windsor, Alyse) |
| REFERRAL OF #8 Notice of Settlement to Judge Bivins. (srd) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Pruco Life Insurance Company, Prudential Financial, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent The Prudential Insurance Company of America for Pruco Life Insurance Company.. (Windsor, Alyse) |
Filing 6
Order STRIKING #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, filed by Pruco Life Insurance Company. Defendant is ORDERED to re-file their corporate disclosure statement on this Court's required disclosure statement form on or before 11/14/2023 as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/07/2023. (srd)
|
|
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant Pruco Life Insurance Company's Motion for Extension of Time #4 . For good cause shown, the deadline for Defendant's Answer or other response is EXTENDED to December 6, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/7/2023. (Bivins, Sonja)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (srd) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Pruco Life Insurance Company. (Windsor, Alyse) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge for trial. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (srd) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Pruco Life Insurance Company, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Financial, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent The Prudential Insurance Company of America for Pruco Life Insurance Company.. (Windsor, Alyse) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3294267, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Pruco Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Windsor, Alyse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dodd v. Pruco Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia H. Dodd | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Rayborn Sport |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pruco Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Alyse Nicole Windsor |
| Represented By: | James Sarven Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
