Rodgers v. O'Malley
| Latanya D. Rodgers |
| Martin O'Malley |
| 1:2024cv00224 |
| July 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT (Attorney Richard Blake,Richard Blake for Martin O'Malley added). Social Security Brief due by 10/7/2024. (Blake, Richard) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Blake on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Blake, Richard) |
| Filing 8 The Consent of the Parties to the Exercise of Jurisdiction By a United States Magistrate Judge #7 is NOTED. IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to the Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C.636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73. (Steele, William) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Martin O'Malley.. (Todd, Victoria) |
| REFERRAL OF #7 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge to Judge Steele. (cjr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Victoria Owen Todd on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Todd, Victoria) |
Filing 5
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Answer due within 60 days after transmission of Notice of Social Security Action; Plaintiff's Brief due 30 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 07/10/2024. (cjr)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Social Security Action. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. (cjr) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER granting Doc. #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Latanya D. Rogers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 07/09/2024. (vge)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (cjr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Latanya D. Rodgers. (Holland, Laura) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley ( IFP.), filed by Latanya D. Rodgers. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 10/7/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Atty, #3 Summons Chief Counsel, #4 US Atty Gen) (Holland, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodgers v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Owen Todd |
| Represented By: | Richard Blake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latanya D. Rodgers | |
| Represented By: | Laura Holland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
