Hill v. Mobile City Council et al
Plaintiff: Reginald J. Hill, II
Defendant: Mobile City Council and City of Mobile
Case Number: 1:2024cv00306
Filed: August 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Sonja F Bivins
Referring Judge: Kristi K DuBose
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - #3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Mobile, Mobile City Council is DENIED as MOOT. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as a shotgun pleading, and Hill is GRANTED LEAVE to file a second amended complaint on or before 12/6/2024. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/7/2024. (meh)
October 1, 2024 MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Mobile, Mobile City Council, #1 Notice of Removal. Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh)
September 4, 2024 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Mobile, Mobile City Council, #1 Notice of Removal. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants joint motion to dismiss (Doc. 3) be DENIED without prejudice as moot, that Hills amended complaint (Doc. 1-1 at 51-54) be DISMISSED without prejudice, and that Hill be GRANTED LEAVE to file an amended complaint that complies with the provisions listed herein. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 9/4/2024. (meh)
August 30, 2024 Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Mobile, Mobile City Council. (Goodloe, Emma)
August 30, 2024 MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss, referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (fz)
August 27, 2024 Filing 2 Answer due from City of Mobile, Mobile City Council pursuant to FRCP 81(c). (meh)
August 26, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405, Receipt number BALSDC-3449287, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by CITY OF MOBILE, a municipal corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Mobile City Council consent, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Goodloe, Emma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Mobile City Council et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mobile City Council
Represented By: Michael Mark Linder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Mobile
Represented By: Ricardo Andrew Woods
Represented By: Emma P Goodloe
Represented By: Catherine Simon Spann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald J. Hill, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?