McKesson Corporation v. Coastal Fairhope, LLC et al
| McKesson Corporation |
| Coastal Fairhope, LLC and Steven Carter |
| Steven Carter |
| McKesson Corporation |
| 1:2025cv00543 |
| December 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Terry F Moorer |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ENDORSED ORDER granting #26 Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Stay this action for the reasons set forth in the motion. The parties are ORDERED to file a status report no later than July 1, 2027, if a stipulation of dismissal is not filed prior to that date. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/12/26. (lto)
|
| Filing 26 MOTION to Stay filed by McKesson Corporation. (Harris, Benjamin) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #26 MOTION to Stay Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (mab) |
| Filing 25 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: Response to Order to Show Cause #24 filed by Plaintiff McKesson Corporation. (lto) |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #23 Order filed by McKesson Corporation. (Harris, Benjamin) Modified on 4/22/2026 (fz) |
| REFERRAL OF #24 Response to Order to Show Cause to Judge Murray. (fz) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER directing Plaintiff to show cause as to why it has not filed for entry of default against Coastal Fairhope, LLC on or before 5/5/2026. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant Coastal Fairhope, LLC, as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 4/21/2026. Copy of this order mailed to Coastal Fairhope, LLC and Steven Carter. (fz)
|
| Filing 22 ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, and COUNTERCLAIMS against McKesson Corporation regarding #1 Complaint, by Steven Carter. Referred to Judge Murray. (fz) |
|
Filing 21
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Because of Defendant Steven Carter's pro se status and for the sake of judicial economy and efficiency, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file Document 9-1 - Defendant Steven Carter's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims - as a separate docket entry. However, Defendant Carter is advised that every pleading, motion, notice, or brief that he serves on Plaintiff from this day forward must also be filed with the Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Defendant with instructions on how to file a copy of all future documents he serves on Plaintiff with the Court. In addition, all responses or claims purportedly set forth by Defendant Coastal Fairhope, LLC in Carter's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims are hereby STRICKEN because Coastal Fairhope, LLC cannot represent itself pro se in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 3/2/26. (lto)
|
|
Filing 20
ENDORSED ORDER construing #11 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim purportedly filed in a pro se capacity by Defendant Coastal Fairhope, LLC as a motion to strike the counterclaim and STRIKING the counterclaim because a limited liability company cannot appear pro se. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), cited in Hancock Whitney Bank v. FLC Living, LLC, Civ. A. No. 1:24-00143-KD-MU at Doc. 11 Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 2/27/26. (lto) Modified on 3/2/2026 (lto).
|
|
Filing 19
ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot #10 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default by the Court as to Defendant Coastal Fairhope, LLC based on the Court granting Coastal Fairhope an extension to file an answer to the complaint to April 2, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 2/27/26. (lto)
|
|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER granting #16 Defendant Coastal Fairhope, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Obtain Counsel. Coastal Fairhope, LLC is GRANTED an extension to April 2, 2026 to retain counsel and file its answer to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 2/27/26. (lto)
|
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER striking #15 this copy of Defendant's motion for extension of time that was served on and submitted by Plaintiff because it is a duplicate of the same motion filed by Defendant at Doc. 16. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 2/27/26. (lto)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Steven Carter. Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (Duplicate of Doc. #15 ) (fz) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Obtain Counsel filed by Steven Carter; Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (mab) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by McKesson Corporation of filing of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Obtain Counsel (Harris, Benjamin) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION for Entry of Default by Court; #11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (fz) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by McKesson Corporation re #9 Notice (Other) Answer to Counterclaim (Harris, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING action to the Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/18/2026. Copy mailed to Defendant Carter. (fz)
|
| REFERRAL OF #13 Notice of Filing Answer to Counterclaim to Judge Murray. (tot) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim filed by McKesson Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Answer and Counterclaim) (Harris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Default by Court filed by McKesson Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Answer and Counterclaim) (Harris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by McKesson Corporation of Filing of Answer and Counterclaim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Answer and Counterclaim) (Harris, Benjamin) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION for Entry of Default by the Court; and #11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by McKesson Corporation. Steven Carter served on 1/19/2026, answer due 2/9/2026 (Harris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Disclosure Statement #5 filed by Plaintiff McKesson Corporation reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 6 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Terry F. Moorer: #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by McKesson Corporation. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (fz) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff McKesson Corporation. (Harris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by McKesson Corporation. Coastal Fairhope, LLC served on 1/5/2026, answer due 1/26/2026 (Harris, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Blank Disclosure Statement form e-mailed to Plaintiff McKesson Corporation; Disclosure Statement Due 1/7/2026. (Counsel, please use the Court's form.) (mab) |
| Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Steven Carter, Coastal Fairhope, LLC. (Note to Counsel: The Summonses have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service.) (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven Carter, Coastal Fairhope, LLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number AALSDC-3748834, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by McKesson Corporation. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 3/30/2026. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1-3, #3 Supplement Drafted Summons - Coastal Fairhope, LLC, #4 Supplement Drafted Summons - Steven Carter) (Harris, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
