Barnett v. Huron Law Group PLLC
Plaintiff: Erin B Barnett
Defendant: Huron Law Group PLLC
Case Number: 1:2026cv00166
Filed: May 6, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Bert W Milling
Referring Judge: Terry F Moorer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Set Aside #9 Corrected MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgment against Defendant, #7 Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Erin B Barnett. (Odom, Bradley)
June 22, 2026 Opinion or Order REFERRAL OF #13 Response in Opposition to Motion to Judge Moorer. (fz)
June 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Reeves Harper on behalf of Huron Law Group PLLC (Harper, Catherine)
June 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause on or before July 26, 2026 why this motion (Doc. #10 ) should not be granted. Additionally, the Court previously noted that Plaintiff failed to include a certificate of service on on either motion for default judgment (Docs. #8 , #9 ) and was prepared to address the failure by separate order when this new motion came in that indicates Defendant is now aware of the motion for default judgment. However, in the future, Plaintiff is put on notice that a certificate of service is required for every pleading especially in instances where a party has not yet appeared and electronic notifications are not automatically generated when filing. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/17/2026. (fz)
June 17, 2026 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION to Set Aside #9 Corrected MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgment against Defendant, #7 Clerk's Entry of Default; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
June 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Set Aside #9 Corrected MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgment against Defendant, #7 Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Huron Law Group PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Answer) (Chappell, Morgan)
June 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corrected MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgment against Defendant filed by Erin B Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of E. Barnett) (Odom, Bradley)
June 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgement against Defendant filed by Erin B Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of E. Barnett) (Odom, Bradley)
June 12, 2026 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgement against Defendant; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
June 12, 2026 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 Corrected MOTION for Default Judgment as to Final Monetary Judgment against Defendant; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
June 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Huron Law Group PLLC. Copy mailed to Defendant on 6/11/2026. (fz)
June 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default Against Defendant filed by Erin B Barnett. (Odom, Bradley) Modified on 6/11/2026 (fz)
May 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Answer due from Huron Law Group PLLC pursuant to FRCP 12(a) (See Doc. 5-1). (mab)
May 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE by Erin B Barnett re #1 Complaint, of Filing Affidavit of Service (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Odom, Bradley)
May 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Bradley S. Odom. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 5/7/2026. (cmj)
May 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Huron Law Group PLLC. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (fz)
May 7, 2026 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Bradley S. Odom to Appear Pro Hac Vice; referred to Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr. (fz)
May 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Bradley S. Odom to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 100, Receipt number AALSDC-3810863, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Erin B. Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Cert. of Good Standing (N.D. Fla.)) (Odom, Bradley)
May 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Huron Law Group PLLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number AALSDC-3810853, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Erin B. Barnett. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 8/4/2026. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Odom, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. Huron Law Group PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erin B Barnett
Represented By: Bradley S. Odom
Represented By: Bradley S. Odom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huron Law Group PLLC
Represented By: Morgan Eason Chappell
Represented By: Catherine Reeves Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?