Hicks v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Betty J. Hicks
Defendant: Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. and SouthTrust Mobile Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2007cv00459
Filed: June 27, 2007
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Perry
0 Judge:
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty J. Hicks
Represented By: Patricia A. Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Christian Haug
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SouthTrust Mobile Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?