Stevens v. Horton Homes, Inc.

Plaintiff: Gary L. Stevens
Defendant: Horton Homes, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv00418
Filed: July 17, 2008
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2008 28 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT stating that the Motion 10 to remand filed in this case is GRANTED and that this case be REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Dallas County, Alabama. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/30/08. Copies to parties on 10/1/08. (mpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. Horton Homes, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary L. Stevens
Represented By: Randy Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Horton Homes, Inc.
Represented By: James L. Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?