Landrum v. Hetzel

Petitioner: Michael Landrum
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Case Number: 2:2011cv00227
Filed: May 5, 2011
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Marengo
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge: Callie V. S. Granade
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 13, 2012 33 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Respondent Gary Hetzel & against Petitioner Michael Landrum as set out. This action is DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE. Pet is not entitled to a certificate of appealability &, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 1/13/2012. (copy mailed to Pet on 1/13/12) (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Landrum v. Hetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Landrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?