Vasser v. Dallas-Selma CA & CDC Inc
| Larry Donnell Vasser |
| Doni Ingram, Dallas-Selma CA & CDC Inc, Mary Twitty and Marsha Lawrence |
| 2:2011cv00234 |
| May 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Selma Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| William H. Steele |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/26/2012. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
41
Order directing the Plaintiff to perfect service on the unserved defendants which are Lawrence (and/or the United States), Twitty and Ingram and to provide proof of such service by 12/6/2011. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/20/2011. Copy of order & 3 blank summons mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
33
Order granting in part 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by United States of America & Marsha Lawrence. The plaintiff's Title VII claim is dismissed with prejudice as to the movants. To the extent the motion attacks the plaintiff's negligence a nd wantonness claims, it is denied. Plaintiff is ordered by 10/17/2011 to show cause why his action against Lawrence and/or the United States should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m). The movants' response is due by 10/24/2011. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/3/2011. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
