KTK Mining of Virginia, LLC v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
KTK Mining of Virginia, LLC |
City of Selma, Alabama and William T. Riley |
2:2012cv00655 |
October 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Selma Office |
Dallas |
Kristi K. DuBose |
William E. Cassady |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this action with prejudice subject to the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for a period of one year from the date of the aforementioned Order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/12/2013. (cmj) |
Filing 82 ORDER granting KTK's 58 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the City's Motion for Summary Judgment 57 is denied as to KTK's procedural due process claims only, as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/31/2013. (cmj) |
Filing 44 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 29 MOTION to Dismiss. Accordingly, these specific claims, as set forth in the following Counts, are NOT DISMISSED and remain in this case: Count One (First Amendment and procedur al due process claim); Count Four (conversion as to personal property); Count Five (negligence and wantonness); Count Seven (permanent injunctive relief); and Count Eight (appeal of the suspension/revocation of KTK's building permit by the City of Selma). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/2/2013. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.