Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. SafetyNet YouthCare, Inc.
||Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program
||SafetyNet YouthCare, Inc.
||October 25, 2013
||US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
||Sonja F. Bivins
||Callie V. S. Granade
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||Disability Act of 1990
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 15, 2014
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, entered in favor of Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program, and against SafetyNet YouthCare, Inc. SafetyNet Youthcare, Inc. is PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from denying Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program reasonable access to its intensive and moderate programs located at the Minter, Alabama facility. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/15/2014. (mab)
|December 12, 2014
ORDER, DENYING 62 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by SafetyNet Youthcare, Inc.; GRANTING 63 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program; and DENYING 64 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Alabama Departmen t of Human Resources. ADAP and SafetyNet are required to meet and to develop a protocol consistent with this order for presentation to the Court no later than January 30, 2015. Declaratory judgment is entered against SafetyNet, and SafetyNet is perm anently enjoined from denying ADAP reasonable access to its intensive and moderate programs at the Minter, Alabama facility. A separate judgment will be entered. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the injunction. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/12/2014. (mab)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?