Jackson et al v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 18, 2015
JUDGMENT entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants City of Selma, Chief William T. Riley, Sergeant Kenta Fulford and Sergeant Sam Miller on Counts One, Two, and Three of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs state law claims against all Defe ndants (Counts Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight,and Nine) are DISMISSED without prejudice, as the Court declines to continue exercising supplemental jurisdiction over them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/13/2015. (cmj)
|June 19, 2014
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Substitute Party. The Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint only for the purpose of naming Sheriff Huffman as the estate's representative in place of Catherine Moorer and Denise Grayson. Any further amendment must be sought in accordance with Rule 15(a)(2). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/19/2014. copies to parties. (sdb)
|April 30, 2014
Order denying 15 MOTION to Appoint Administrator Ad Litem or, in the alternative, Motion to Amend Complaint filed by K.L.M., Debra Jackson, The Estate of Keoshia Hill, The Estate of Bill Jackson. Granting in part 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by K.L.M., The Estate of Keoshia Hill, The Estate of Bill Jackson. Responses to the 13 Motion to Dismiss due by 5/14/2014. Replies due by 5/21/2014. Motion to be taken under submission on 5/21/2014. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/30/2014. copies to parties. (sdb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?