Besteder v. Alshohati

Plaintiff: Beulah Besteder
Defendant: Sadik Alshohati
Case Number: 2:2015cv00220
Filed: April 22, 2015
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Marengo
Presiding Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: Prohibition of discrimination by public accommodations
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 3, 2015 11 Opinion or Order of the Court Order denying 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Sadik Alshohati filed by Beulah Besteder. Plaintiff is ordered to Show Cause by 8/24/2015 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to name a proper defendant. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/3/2015. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Besteder v. Alshohati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beulah Besteder
Represented By: John T. Sutton(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sadik Alshohati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?