Rudolph v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Markus Jamaal Rudolph
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv00128
Filed: March 25, 2016
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Referring Judge: Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 12, 2016 34 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favorof Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, and against Plaintiff Markus Jamaal Rudolph. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 12/12/2016. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rudolph v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Markus Jamaal Rudolph
Represented By: Jessica Friedman(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?