Johnson v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Sheroderick Johnson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2018cv00110
Filed: March 9, 2018
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Selma Office
County: Mobile
0 Judge: William E Cassady
1 Judge: Kristi K DuBose
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
March 9, 2018 MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Referred to Judge William E. Cassady. (nah)
March 9, 2018 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheroderick Johnson. (Coplin, William)
March 9, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( IFP.), filed by Sheroderick Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Coplin, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheroderick Johnson
Represented By: William T. Coplin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?