Jones v. Payssa et al
| Vivian M. Jones |
| Lee Payssa, Stephen Smith, Ferroglobe/Globe Mettallurgic, Inc. and Globe Specialty Metal, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00262 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Selma Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
JUDGMENT in favor of Dft & against Plf. Plf shall recover nothing by this suit. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document as final judgment as set out. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 8/13/19. (tot)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 61 ENDORSED ORDER granting 60 Second MOTION for Protective Order. Defendant Ferroglobe must file and serve a motion for such an award, containing any evidence and argument Ferroglobe necessary to show both the amount and reasonableness of the expenses requested, and entitlement thereto on or before 3/13/2019 as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 02/27/2019. (srd)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 MOTION to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED and that the claims against Payssa and Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 08/10/2018. (nah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
