Rush v. Lopez et al
Plaintiff: Quinetta Rush
Defendant: Mario Luis Lopez and HaulVIP, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00152
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Katherine P Nelson
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P.73. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 5/26/2021. (tgw)
May 24, 2021 Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Heath, Robert)
May 18, 2021 Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by HaulVIP, Inc., Mario Luis Lopez.. (Heath, Robert)
May 17, 2021 Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand State Court Case filed by HaulVIP, Inc., Mario Luis Lopez. (Heath, Robert)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT-ONLY ORDER noting #6 #12 Disclosure Statements filed by HaulVIP, Inc. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 5/17/2021. (ctn)
May 17, 2021 Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by HaulVIP, Inc., Mario Luis Lopez.. (Heath, Robert) Consent not signed by all parties. (tgw).
May 12, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Disclosure Statement filed by HaulVIP, Inc.. (Heath, Robert)
May 12, 2021 Filing 11 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge for trial. Consent Form due by 6/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment, #2 Consent Form) (tgw)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT-ONLY ORDER Setting Motion Deadlines re: #9 MOTION to Remand State Court Case filed by Quinetta Rush. Defendants' brief in response to said motion, if any, must be filed and served no later than Mon. 5/24/2021. Plaintiff's brief in reply to the response, if any, must be filed and served no later than Tues. 6/1/2021. Motion to be taken under submission on Wed. 6/2/2021, at which time no further submissions related to the issues raised may be filed unless the proponent first obtains leave of court for good cause shown, except as otherwise allowed under S.D. Ala. CivLR 7(f)(3). Should the Court determine that oral argument would be beneficial, a hearing will be set by separate order. Otherwise, the motion is being submitted without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); S.D. Ala. CivLR 7(h). "Oral argument requests must contain specific reasons why oral argument would be helpful." S.D. Ala. CivLR 7(h). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 5/11/2021. (ctn)
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION to Remand State Court Case filed by Quinetta Rush. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's State Court Complaint) (Crittenton, Adrian)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/7/2021.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 5/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (tgw)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order directing Defendant HaulVIP to file a supplemental Disclosure Statement by 5/12/2021. The Clerk is directed to redesignate this case as a Northern Division action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 5/5/2021. (tgw)
May 3, 2021 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant HaulVIP, Inc.. (Heath, Robert)
May 3, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mario Luis Lopez. (Heath, Robert)
May 3, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by HaulVIP, Inc.. (Heath, Robert)
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel filed by HaulVIP, Inc., Mario Luis Lopez. (Ireland, Horace) Modified on 4/8/2021 (tgw).
March 31, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge for trial. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment Form) (tgw)
March 31, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-2784295, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by HaulVIP, Inc., Mario Luis Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Heath, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rush v. Lopez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mario Luis Lopez
Represented By: Horace Cecil Ireland, III
Represented By: Robert Wayne Heath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HaulVIP, Inc.
Represented By: Horace Cecil Ireland, III
Represented By: Robert Wayne Heath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quinetta Rush
Represented By: Adrian R. Crittenton
Represented By: Charles James, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?