Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
| Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad |
| Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis, Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General, Dallas County Circuit Court, Alabama Bar Association, Alabama Supreme Court and Alabama Judiciary Inquiry Commission |
| 2:2023cv00020 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| William E Cassady |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kalim A. R. Muhammad, Karima Lakssir Muhammad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits); ref to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #10 MOTION for More Definite Statement Defendant DeMoss' filed by Kalim A. R. Muhammad, Karima Lakssir Muhammad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits); ref to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Kalim A. R. Muhammad, Karima Lakssir Muhammad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits); ref to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
Filing 17
Order Setting Motion Deadline re: #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Cowin Knowles and #10 MOTION for More Definite Statement Defendant DeMoss' filed by Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss. Responses due by 3/27/2023; Replies due by 4/3/2023; Motion to be taken under submission on 4/4/2023. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 3/13/23. (cmj)
|
| Filing 16 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: Corporate Disclosure Statement #14 filed by Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss. A review reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action (dtd) |
| Filing 15 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #14 filed by Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss. (Boyd, David) |
| Filing 13 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of Corporate Disclosure Statement #11 filed by Cowin Knowles reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (dtd) |
| Filing 12 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #11 filed by Cowin Knowles. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Cowin Knowles. (Novak, Tabor) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for More Definite Statement Defendant DeMoss' filed by Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss. (Boyd, David) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Cowin Knowles. (Novak, Tabor) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement , #10 MOTION for More Definite Statement Defendant DeMoss' to Judge Beaverstock. (fz) |
|
Filing 8
Order Setting Motion Deadline re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Alabama Attorney General. Responses due by 3/14/2023; Replies due by 3/21/2023; Motion to be taken under submission on 3/22/2023.Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 2/28/23. (copy mailed to plaintiffs) (cmj)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Alabama Attorney General. (Crowder, Andrew) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION to Dismiss to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Alabama Judiciary Inquiry Commission, Ciara Dennis. Mailed to plaintiff for service (cmj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons as to Alabama Judiciary Inquiry Commission by Kalim A. R. Muhammad, Karima Lakssir Muhammad (Attachments: #1 Wendys Summons) (cmj) |
|
Filing 4
Service Order entered 1/24/2023. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 3/3/2023.. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 1/24/23. (copy mailed to plaintiffs with summons) (cmj)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Alabama Attorney General, Alabama Bar Association, Alabama Judiciary Inquiry Commission, Alabama Supreme Court, Dallas County Circuit Court, Robert Lee [Tripp] DeMoss, Ciara Dennis, Cowin Knowles, Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. Summons mailed to Kalim Muhammad in prepaid envelope provided. (cmj) |
| Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray. Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady no longer assigned to the case. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix JB-MU after the case number on all future pleadings. (cle) |
| REFERRAL OF #1 Complaint, 2 Filing Fee Received to Judge Murray. (cmj) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 1061752. (cjr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kalim A. R. Muhammad. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 4/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11) Referred to MJ Cassady. (cjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
