Harris v. International Paper Company
| Joni D. Harris |
| International Paper Company |
| 2:2024cv00322 |
| September 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Joni D. Harris. (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 filed by International Paper Company. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
| Filing 7 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 filed by International Paper Company reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (aws) |
Filing 6
Order re: #4 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by International Paper Company. Plaintiff is to respond to the Motion by 11/1/2024. Defendant may file a reply by 11/8/2024. Motion to be taken under submission on 11/8/2024. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 10/18/24. (mbp)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant International Paper Company. (Harris, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by International Paper Company. (Baker, Tammy) |
| Filing 3 SERVICE ORDER entered 9/6/2024. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 10/21/2024. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 09/06/2024. (cjr) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to International Paper Company. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (cjr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joni Harris ( Filing fee $405 receipt number AALSDC-3454516, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Joni Harris. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 12/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge, #2 Exhibit B- Notice, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons) (Morgan, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. International Paper Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joni D. Harris | |
| Represented By: | James Richard Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: International Paper Company | |
| Represented By: | Daniel B Harris |
| Represented By: | Tammy L. Baker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
