Emrit v. Soros et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Federal Trade Commission (FTC), George Soros, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) |
| 1:2019cv00003 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Ralph R Beistline |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 6/19/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This case is DISMISSED. The Application to Waive the Filing Fee, at docket #3 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 6/18/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge by Ronald Satish Emrit (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the judges, this case has been reassigned to Judge Beistline for all further proceedings. Please use the following case number for future filings: 1:19-cv-00003-RRB. (CME, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), George Soros, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
