Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al v. United States Forest Service et al
| Alaska Wilderness League, Alaska Rainforest Defenders, National Audubon Society, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity and Southeast Alaska Conservation Council |
| United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Earl Stewart and David Schmid |
| 1:2019cv00006 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Two Thumb Drives consisting of the Administrative Record received on 7/2/19 re #8 . Thumb drive is available conventionally for review at the Clerk's Office. A copy of the Administrative Record was forwarded to the chambers of Judge Gleason. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by All Defendants.(Norman, Erika) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lodging Administrative Record by David Schmid, Earl Stewart, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration, #2 Exhibit AR Index)(Norman, Erika) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: The joint motion at Docket #6 is GRANTED. administrative Record due 07/02/2019; Defendant's answer due 07/03/2019; plf's opening brief due 07/12/2019; Def's opposition due 08/12/2019; plf's reply due 08/23/2019. Plf's motion for preliminary injunction due 08/15/2019; opposition due 08/29/2019; reply due 09/06/2019. (See Order for details). Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 06/12/2019. (CME, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION Entry of Scheduling Order by David Schmid, Earl Stewart, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Norman, Erika) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Erika Danielle Norman on behalf of All Defendants (Norman, Erika) |
| Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant United States Forest Service, (Attachments: #1 United States Department of Agriculture, #2 David Schmid, #3 Earl Stewart, #4 U.S. Attorney General, #5 U.S. Attorney)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Alaska Rainforest Defenders, Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council. (Waldo, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Waldo, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Schmid, Earl Stewart, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 097--2695259.), filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defense Council, Alaska Rainforest Defenders, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Wilderness League, Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon Society, Sierra Club. (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Forest Service, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Department of Agriculture, #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant David Schmid, #4 Unissued Summons re Defendant Earl Stewart, #5 Unissued Summons re Defendant William Barr, #6 Unissued Summons re Defendant Bryan Schroder)(Waldo, Thomas) |
| Summons Issued as to David Schmid, Earl Stewart, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
