Lane v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Charles Lane
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2021cv00023
Filed: December 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: Ralph R Beistline
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/9/22. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #9 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Marie Constance Scheperle on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Scheperle, Marie)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND RESPONSE: Application to Waive File Fee is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court to issue summons. Defendant to file Answer/Response w/in 60 days. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/17/21. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE re #5 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Maren Miller Bam, at docket #5 , is authorized under D.Ak. LR 83.1(d). (RMC, COURT STAFF)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Maren Miller Bam. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $250.00 paid. Receipt number 097--3178708.) by Charles Lane.(Bam, Maren)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (RMC, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Regional Counsel, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Lane.(PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Charles Lane.(PXS, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Lane
Represented By: Maren Miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Marie Constance Scheperle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?