Kahle v. Executive Force Australia PTY LTD

Plaintiff: Michele S. Kahle
Defendant: Executive Force Australia PTY LTD
Case Number: 2:2009cv00008
Filed: October 7, 2009
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Nome Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: John W. Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 7, 2010 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 13 Motion to Remand to State Court; granting 16 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 18 Motion for Hearing; denying 20 Motion to Strike; denying 22 Motion to Strike; denying 23 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 1/7/10. (GMM, CHAMBERS STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kahle v. Executive Force Australia PTY LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele S. Kahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Executive Force Australia PTY LTD
Represented By: Kenneth M. Gutsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?