Grant v. Office of the Secretary of Defense et al
| William Lee Grant, II |
| Missile Defense Agency, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Special Collection Service and State of Illinois |
| 2:2019cv00005 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Ralph R Beistline |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/30/19. (RMC, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; complaint dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions denied as moot. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/30/19. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL RELATED DOCUMENT by William Lee Grant, II re #1 Complaint. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the judges the following case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Judge Ralph R. Beistline for all further proceedings. Please use case number 2:19-cv-00005-RRB for all future filings. (CME, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Lee Grant, II.(KMC, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Missile Defense Agency, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Special Collection Service, State of Illinois (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by William Lee Grant, II.(KMC, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
