E-Terra, LLC v. SARS Corporation et al
E-Terra, LLC |
SARS Corporation and Secure Asset Reporting Service, Inc. |
3:2008cv00123 |
May 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Contract: Other Office |
Anchorage |
John W. Sedwick |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER re 81 Motion to Compel. DENIED without prejudice to a subsequent motion to compel to be brought within 21 days following a sincere and meaningful effort to resolve the discovery dispute. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 2/18/10. (GMM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 85 ORDER denying 67 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 2/3/10. (GMM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 84 ORDER denying 59 Motion in Limine; denying 61 Motion in Limine; denying 64 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 2/2/10. (GMM, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel subject to the parties' agreement on and filing of a protective order concerning the Tracpoint software within three (3) weeks from the date of this order. If the parties are unable to agree upon and file a p rotective order within that time, each party shall file a separate proposed protective order with the court within four (4) weeks from the date of this order, and the court will choose one of the two proposed orders to govern production of the Tracpoint software. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 10/27/09. (GMM, COURT STAFF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.