Coleman v. Donahoe

Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe
Plaintiff: George M. Coleman
Case Number: 3:2011cv00006
Filed: January 18, 2011
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Anchorage Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: H. Russel Holland
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 24, 2013 64 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: granting Second Motion for Summary Judgment 54 . Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 05/24/2013. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF)
October 29, 2012 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: re Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 25 (see order for full details). Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 10/29/2012. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Donahoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe
Represented By: Edward Bryan Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George M. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?