TKC Aerospace, Inc. v. Muhs

Plaintiff: TKC Aerospace, Inc.
Defendant: Charles Taylor Muhs
Case Number: 3:2011cv00189
Filed: September 26, 2011
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Anchorage Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: H. Russel Holland
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 22, 2015 296 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 286 Motion for Summary Judgment; plf may file mot for atty fees & costs & file prop judg by 11/23/15; def's response due by 12/7/15; reply due w/i 7 days of response. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 10/22/15. (PRR, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TKC Aerospace, Inc. v. Muhs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TKC Aerospace, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas B. Mishkin
Represented By: Douglas C. Proxmire
Represented By: Michael D. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Taylor Muhs
Represented By: Neal Steven Barlia
Represented By: Victoria Anne Kummer
Represented By: Susan Orlansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?