Thomas v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Perry K. Thomas
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2013cv00126
Filed: July 8, 2013
Court: Alaska District Court
Office: Anchorage Office
County: Anchorage
Presiding Judge: Timothy M. Burgess
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 4, 2017 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court awards the requested $19,394 in attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Thomas's counsel, Robert A. Friedman, is directed to pay Thomas the amount of $6,950.63, the attorney's fee the Defendant paid him under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on 1/4/2017. (DJE, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perry K. Thomas
Represented By: Robert A. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?