Welton v. Gilligan

Welton v. Gilligan

Petitioner:	Suzette Welton
Respondent:	Mike Gilligan
Case Number:	3:2015cv00149
Filed:	August 25, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Alaska
Office:	Anchorage Office
County:	Anchorage
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L. Gleason
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 10, 2018	Filing 49 ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS: Respondents Motion to Dismiss at Docket 29 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment accordingly. The Court further finds that Ms. Welton has not made the requisite substantial show ing of the denial of a constitutional right, and therefore a certificate of appealability will not be issued by this Court. Ms. Welton may request a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 12/07/2018. (CME, COURT STAFF)
September 19, 2017	Filing 37 ORDER: re Pending Motions. The Motion to Stay is DENIED 28 and the Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendations 34 . As to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Petition 29 , the Court ACCEPTS the analysis of the Final Repor t and Recommendation. The Court further ORDERS Ms. Welton to, within 7 days from the date of this order, decide whether to delete the second, unexhausted claim (Claim 2) and proceed solely on Claim 1 (see order for full details). Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 09/19/2017. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 10, 2018

Filing 49 ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS: Respondents Motion to Dismiss at Docket 29 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment accordingly. The Court further finds that Ms. Welton has not made the requisite substantial show ing of the denial of a constitutional right, and therefore a certificate of appealability will not be issued by this Court. Ms. Welton may request a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 12/07/2018. (CME, COURT STAFF)

September 19, 2017

Filing 37 ORDER: re Pending Motions. The Motion to Stay is DENIED 28 and the Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendations 34 . As to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Petition 29 , the Court ACCEPTS the analysis of the Final Repor t and Recommendation. The Court further ORDERS Ms. Welton to, within 7 days from the date of this order, decide whether to delete the second, unexhausted claim (Claim 2) and proceed solely on Claim 1 (see order for full details). Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 09/19/2017. (AEM, CHAMBERS STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Welton v. Gilligan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Suzette Welton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Gilligan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?