Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
| Southcentral Foundation |
| Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium |
| 3:2017cv00018 |
| January 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Anchorage Office |
| Anchorage |
| Timothy M. Burgess |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
411
ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW: The Court hereby ORDERS in camera review of the 15 documents ANTHC withheld from SCF. ANTHC shall file the 15 documents ex parte on or before January 24, 2024. Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 1/8/2024. (SCD, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing
352
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 316 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on 7/20/22. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing
334
ORDER DENYING 296 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on April 21, 2022. (NMG, CHAMBERS STAFF)
|
|
Filing
291
ORDER GRANTING 287 Motion to Stay signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on July 26, 2021. If the Parties do not settle or otherwise reach a resolution in the case by August 18, 2021, the Parties are ORDERED to file briefing on the impact of the Ninth Circuits Order on or before August 23, 2021. (NMG, CHAMBERS STAFF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
