Seward Property, LLC v. Arctic Wolf Marine, Inc. et al
| Seward Property, LLC |
| Arctic Wolf Marine, Inc., Del Schultz, Henry Tomingas and Sharon Davenport |
| 3:2018cv00078 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Anchorage Office |
| Anchorage |
| H. Russel Holland |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
196
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 188 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 189 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 190 Motion to Enforce Judgment. Seward Property shall recover from Defendants Tomingas, Arctic Wolf Marine and Schul tz, jointly and severally, the following amounts: $57,731.50 in attorney's fees; prejudgment interest in the amount of $1,170.42 and postjudgment interest; $17,700 in additional vessel storage and blocking fees. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 12/5/2022. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER denying 135 Motion for Extension of Time to Remove; denying 136 Motion for Discovery; denying 139 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 9/2/21. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 97 Motion to Dismiss (See PDF for details). Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 12/23/20. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
