Gentleman v. Davol Inc. et al
| Jolene Gentleman |
| C.R. Bard and Davol Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00184 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Anchorage Office |
| Anchorage |
| H Russel Holland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by Jolene Gentleman. (Henderson, David) |
Filing 6
ORDER re Notice to Counsel: Plaintiff shall either file proofs of service by seven days from the entry of this order or file a status report concerning service. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Advising counsel of procedures to follow prior to filing a motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 8/22/18. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Davol, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant C.R. Bard)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case by Jolene Gentleman (Henderson, David) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Henderson, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 097--2561865.), filed by Jolene Gentleman.(Henderson, David) |
| Summons Issued as to C.R. Bard, Davol Inc. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
