Rogers v. The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock
| David Allen Rogers |
| The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock |
| 3:2019cv00096 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SLG TEXT ORDER: The second motion for extension of time to answer (Docket #12 ) is GRANTED, and the answer filed on July 3, 2019 at Docket #14 is accepted as timely filed. (CME, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock.(Hozubin, Rebecca) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of COUNSEL re #12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (Hozubin, Rebecca) |
| Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hozubin, Rebecca) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Discovery due by 6/10/2020. (See PDF for details) Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 6/17/19. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock answer due 6/21/2019. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 6/17/19. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hozubin, Rebecca) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hozubin, Rebecca) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE INITIAL SCHEDULING & PLANNING CONFERENCE REPORT: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report within 21 days of service of this order. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 5/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Scheduling and Planning Conference Report)(JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (Hozubin, Rebecca) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca J. Hozubin on behalf of The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock (Hozubin, Rebecca) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by David Allen Rogers. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock, filed by David Allen Rogers.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Summons Issued as to The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Allen Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Bruce F. Stanford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Estate of Joe C. Ashlock | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca J. Hozubin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
