Borgman et al v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USA
Plaintiff: Nancy Borgman and Matthew Borgman
Defendant: Yamaha Motor Corporation USA
Case Number: 3:2019cv00285
Filed: November 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: H Russel Holland
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 DECLARATION of Adrean Czajkowski re #27 Reply to Response to Motion by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 DECLARATION of Andrew Smith re #27 Reply to Response to Motion by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 DECLARATION of Joe Maniscalco re #27 Reply to Response to Motion by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Thorsness, John)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER re Motion to Dismiss. The court considers the filing of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction to be sufficient good cause to delay the entry of a scheduling order. The court will call upon the parties to update their conference report if the court determines that it has personal jurisdiction of defendant. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 12/19/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 DECLARATION of Matthew Borgman re #23 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Matthew Borgman, Nancy Borgman. (Pace, Daniel)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 DECLARATION of Clayton Meehan re #23 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Matthew Borgman, Nancy Borgman. (Pace, Daniel)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Matthew Borgman, Nancy Borgman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Pace, Daniel)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Decision of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 12/9/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion (Non-Opposition) re #13 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Decision of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with the reservation to seek permission from this Court for jurisdictional discovery filed by Matthew Borgman, Nancy Borgman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Pace, Daniel)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION for Hearing re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thorsness, John)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #17 Motion to Expedite Consideration; granting #16 Motion to Quash Subpoenas. (JLH, COURT STAFF) (JLH, COURT STAFF). Modified on 12/5/2019 replaced document and regenerated (JLH, COURT STAFF).
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of John B. Thorsness re #17 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Motion to Quash Subpoenas (at Docket 16) by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Motion to Quash Subpoenas (at Docket 16) by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thorsness, John)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas (Expedited Consideration) by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order)(Thorsness, John) Modified on 12/2/2019 to seal exhibit A at the request of the attorney (JLH, COURT STAFF).
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Expedite. Plaintiffs shall respond to defendant's motion to stay discovery #13 no later than 12/6/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Expedite Motion to Stay Discovery (Dkt 13) by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Thorsness, John)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Decision of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thorsness, John)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Thorsness, John)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF LODGING STATE COURT DOCUMENT(S) by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Thorsness, John)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECLARATION of Mike Van Wagenen re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Thorsness, John)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Yamaha Motor Corporation USA, filed by All Plaintiffs.(Pace, Daniel)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Thorsness, John)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT SERVICE LIST by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA (Thorsness, John)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Advising counsel of the procedure to follow prior to filing a motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 11/12/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL CASE STATUS REPORT/CASE SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report within 21 days of service of this order. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to Petitioner Subsequent to Removal: Service list due within 10 days. State Court documents due within 20 days. (PXS, COURT STAFF)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA from Superior Court for the State of Alaska, case number 3AN-19-10398CI. ( Filing fee $400/receipt #ANC016325), filed by Yamaha Motor Corporation USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(PXS, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borgman et al v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yamaha Motor Corporation USA
Represented By: John B. Thorsness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Borgman
Represented By: Daniel Ian Pace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Borgman
Represented By: Daniel Ian Pace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?