Otis v. Saul
Holly Dale Otis |
Andrew Saul |
3:2019cv00328 |
December 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Ralph R Beistline |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin J. Groebner on behalf of Andrew Saul (Groebner, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Holly Dale Otis. Agency record due w/in 60 days; Opening brief due w/in 30 days of agency record filing; Answering brief due w/in 30 days; Reply due w/in 14 days. (See order for details.) Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/26/2020. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #9 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E Skrocki on behalf of Andrew Saul (Skrocki, Steven) |
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND RESPONSE: re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Service of process to be completed w/in 90 days and Answer/Response w/in 60 days. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 1/29/2020.(SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6 JUDGE BEISTLINE TEXT ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident) Attorney filed by Attorney Edward A. Wicklund at Docket #5 is hereby GRANTED. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Edward A. Wicklund. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $150.00 paid. Receipt number 097--2814943.) by Holly Dale Otis. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wicklund, Edward) |
Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Andrew Saul, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Holly Dale Otis.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Holly Dale Otis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Otis v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Benjamin J. Groebner |
Represented By: | Steven E Skrocki |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Holly Dale Otis | |
Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.