Orzalli v. Saul
| Heather Orzalli |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv00130 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Ralph R Beistline |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/22/2020. (SDW, COURT STAFF)
|
| Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #10 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons & complaint served on USAG on 7/13/20, filed by Heather Orzalli. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons & complaint served on OGC on 7/10/20, filed by Heather Orzalli. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for summons & complaint served on US Atty Dist. of Alaska on 7/9/20, filed by Heather Orzalli. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E Skrocki on behalf of Andrew Saul (Skrocki, Steven) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE re #3 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Nancy J. Meserow, at docket #3 , is authorized under D.Ak. LR 83.1(d). (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Office of General Counsel, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Office of Attorney General of the USA)(KMC, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Nancy J. Meserow. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $150.00 paid. Receipt number 097--2888043.) by Heather Orzalli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certificate of good standing)(Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Meserow, Nancy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 097--2887981.), filed by Heather Orzalli. (Attachments: #1 Attachment (ALJ Dec.)(redacted))(Meserow, Nancy) |
| Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KMC, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Orzalli v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Steven E Skrocki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Orzalli | |
| Represented By: | Nancy J. Meserow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
