Claycomb v. Saul
Plaintiff: Ryan Allen Claycomb
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv00220
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Gleason
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lars J. Nelson on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Nelson, Lars)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 10/1/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #8 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E Skrocki on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Skrocki, Steven)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SLG TEXT ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice re Attorney Maren Miller Bam, at docket #3 , is hereby GRANTED. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Unissued summons re Defendant Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region X, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney General, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney's Office)(KMC, COURT STAFF)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Ryan Allen Claycomb #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Maren Miller Bam filed by Ryan Allen Claycomb. (KMC, COURT STAFF)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Maren Miller Bam by Ryan Allen Claycomb. (PHV Fee $150/Receipt ANC017160)(KMC, COURT STAFF) Modified to reflect payment received and receipt no. on 9/8/2020 (KMC, COURT STAFF).
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (KMC, COURT STAFF)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul (Filing fee $ 400/Receipt ANC017159), filed by Ryan Allen Claycomb.(KMC, COURT STAFF)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KMC, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Claycomb v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Lars J. Nelson
Represented By: Steven E Skrocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Allen Claycomb
Represented By: Maren Miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?