Costley v. Saul
Plaintiff: Frieda Rose Costley
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv00235
Filed: September 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Gleason
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Frieda Rose Costley. Social Security Administration (SSA) served on 11/5/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Bam, Maren)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Summer Stinson on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Stinson, Summer)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 10/30/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #7 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E Skrocki on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Skrocki, Steven)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SLG TEXT ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice re Attorney Maren Miller Bam, at docket #3 , is hereby GRANTED. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Andrew M. Saul, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney General, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney's Office)(KMC, COURT STAFF)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) ($150/receipt #ANC017228) Attorney Maren Miller Bam by Frieda Rose Costley.(Bam, Maren) Modified on 9/29/2020 to add receipt info. (PXS, COURT STAFF).
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Bam, Maren)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul (Filing fee $400/Receipt #ANC017228), filed by Frieda Rose Costley.(Bam, Maren) Modified on 9/29/2020 to add receipt info(PXS, COURT STAFF).
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KMC, COURT STAFF). Modified to reflect who summons were issued to on 9/30/2020 (KMC, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Costley v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frieda Rose Costley
Represented By: Maren Miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Summer Stinson
Represented By: Steven E Skrocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?