Cochran v. Saul
| Kevin H. Cochran |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv00239 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kevin H. Cochran. Andrew Saul served on 10/30/2020, answer due 12/29/2020. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 9
SLG TEXT ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice re Attorney Edward A. Wicklund, at docket #3 , is hereby GRANTED. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Shata Ling Stucky on behalf of Andrew Saul (Stucky, Shata)
|
|
Filing 7
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 10/2/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #7 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E Skrocki on behalf of Andrew Saul (Skrocki, Steven)
|
|
Filing 5
Receipt of 150.00 non-resident attorney payment for Edward Wicklund as to Plaintiff Kevin H. Cochran. re #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Edward A. Wicklund (PXS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 4
Unissued summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Commissioner of SSA, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Edward A. Wicklund by Kevin H. Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $400/receipt #ANC017222.), filed by Kevin H. Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action)(Wicklund, Edward) Modified on 9/25/2020 to add receipt # (PXS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (PXS, COURT STAFF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cochran v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Steven E Skrocki |
| Represented By: | Shata Ling Stucky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin H. Cochran | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
