Clervrain v. Dunleavy
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant: Mike Dunleavy
Case Number: 3:2020cv00279
Filed: November 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: Ralph R Beistline
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Manetirony Clervrain. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Registration Card)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
November 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Motion for Consideration and Compelling Imposition Financial Burden by Invoking The Ant(s) Movement Act ("TAMA") against Mike Dunleavy, filed by Manetirony Clervrain.(PXS, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clervrain v. Dunleavy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Dunleavy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?