Hull v. Hull et al
| Thomas Hull |
| Jennifer S Henderson, State of Alaska and Chandra Hull |
| 3:2021cv00045 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Ralph R Beistline |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 USCA Scheduling Order as to #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Thomas Hull. 21-35311 The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas Howard Hull opening brief due 06/24/2021. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 12 USCA Case Number 21-35311 for #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Thomas Hull. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT/NOTICE OF APPEAL by Thomas Hull (Fee not paid). (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 4/2/2021. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING SECTION 2241 PROCEEDINGS: This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 4/2/2021. (SDW, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 8 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the judges, the above referenced case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Ralph R. Beistline for all further proceedings. Henceforth, parties to use the following case caption for all future filings in 3:21-cv-00045-RRB. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 7 SLG TEXT ORDER: The Defendants/Respondents document(s) received by the Clerks Office on March 29, 2021, appear to bear fingerprint impressions made in actual blood. A Defendants/Respondents fingerprint(s) are not necessary for any court filing and have no legal significance. However, adulterating a court filing with blood, or any bodily fluid, creates a health and safety risk for court personnel. Accordingly, the document(s) are REJECTED for filing and will be DESTROYED. The document(s) may be resubmitted for filing with the Court without any bodily fluid. (PXS, COURT STAFF) Modified on 3/30/2021 to reflect date received and regenerated NEF(PXS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 Letter re 3 received on 3/25/21 from Thomas Hull. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 ADDITIONAL RELATED DOCUMENT by Thomas Hull. (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the Judges, this case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Sharon L. Gleason for all further proceedings. Pursuant to D.Ak.LMR 2, this case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Matthew McCrary Scoble for pretrial orders or findings and recommendations as appropriate. Please use the following case number on all future filings: 3:21-cv-00045-SLG-MMS. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 RRB TEXT ORDER: The Petitioners filings received by the Clerks Office on March 9, 2021, appear to bear fingerprint impressions made in actual blood. A petitioners fingerprint(s) are not necessary for any court filing, and has no legal significance. However, adulterating a court filing with blood, or any body fluid, creates a health and safety risk for court personnel. Accordingly the filing is REJECTED and may be resubmitted to the Court without any bodily fluid. (CME, COURT STAFF) Modified on 3/10/2021 to clarify filer as "petitioner". NEF regenerated (CME, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (DDS, Court Staff) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28:2241 (Filing fee $ 5/Receipt #ANC017666.), filed by Thomas Hull.(DDS, Court Staff) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
