Rogers v. Knopp et al
| Rhonda Rogers |
| G & H Construction and Helen Knopp |
| 3:2021cv00071 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Timothy M Burgess |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 TMB TEXT ORDER: Based on #4 Stipulation to Remand to State Court, and the Court otherwise finding good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation to Remand is ACCEPTED. The Clerk of Court shall immediately REMAND this matter to the Superior Court for the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District at Anchorage. (NMG, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL RELATED DOCUMENT Stipulation to Remand to State Court by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gilman, Blaine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Removal to Adverse Party by G & H Construction, Helen Knopp (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, state court Notice of Filing Notice of Renewal)(Gilman, Blaine) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Gilman, Blaine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Superior Court for the State of Alaska, case number 3AN-21-04688CI. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 097--3042057), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, Summons, Complaint, and Demand for Jury Trail from case 3AN-21-04688CI)(Gilman, Blaine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
