Stern v. Anchorage Municipality et al
Joachim Stern |
State of Alaska, Walmart Stores, Anchorage Police Department and Anchorage Municipality |
3:2021cv00145 |
June 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Ralph R Beistline |
Sharon L Gleason |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING DEFICIENT FILING: The Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees, at Docket #2 , is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff must file a complaint with prisoner's application to waive prepayment of the filing fee or notice of voluntary dismissal by 8/16/2021. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/16/2021. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the judges, the above referenced case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Ralph R. Beistline for all further proceedings. Henceforth, parties to use the following case caption for all future filings in 3:21-cv-00145-RRB. (SDW, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 Returned/Undeliverable Mail addressed to J. Stern re #1 , #2 . (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joachim Stern.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Suit Notice against Anchorage Municipality, Anchorage Police Department, State of Alaska, Walmart Stores, filed by Joachim Stern.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.