Eclips v. Hustin et al
| Luna Eclips |
| Hustin, Rice, Earl Houser, Nancy Dahlstrom, Sarah Angol and Richard Roe |
| 3:2021cv00185 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Joshua M Kindred |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Returned/Undeliverable Mail addressed to Luna Eclips re #4 . Service on the NEF for the returned mail entry will not be distributed to the addressee. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 Returned/Undeliverable Mail addressed to L. Eclips re 2 . (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING "CASE". Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 8/16/21. (RMC, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 3 Returned/Undeliverable Mail addressed to Luna Eclips re #1 . Service for the NEF of the returned mail will not be redistributed to the addressee. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 JMK TEXT ORDER: By agreement of the Judges, this case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Joshua M. Kindred for all further proceedings. Please use the following case number on all future filings: 3:21-cv-00185-JMK. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Notice of Intent to Sue/Lein against Sarah Angol, Nancy Dahlstrom, Earl Houser, Hustin, Rice, Richard Roe, filed by Luna Eclips. (Attachments: #1 1)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
