Lambert et al v. Powerhouse Gaming, Inc. et al
| Mark Lambert and Business Technology Solutions, LLC |
| Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., Tab King, Inc., Dynamic Game Development, Inc. and Nathan Freels |
| 3:2021cv00191 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| H Russel Holland |
| Contract: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time by Dynamic Game Development, Inc., Nathan Freels, Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., Tab King, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Katchen, Jonathan) |
Filing 13
ORDER re Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint on or before 10/13/2021. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall have until October 1, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, Unopposed by Dynamic Game Development, Inc., Nathan Freels, Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., Tab King, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Katchen, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Dynamic Game Development Inc. on August 17, 2021, filed by Mark Lambert. (Robinson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Powerhouse Gaming Inc. on August 17, 2021, filed by Mark Lambert. (Robinson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Tab King Inc. on August 16, 2021, filed by Mark Lambert. (Robinson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Nathan Freels on August 31, 2021, filed by Mark Lambert. (Robinson, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re Notice to Counsel. Plaintiffs shall either file proof of service or status report within seven days. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Advising counsel of the procedure to follow prior to filing a motion to dismiss. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Docket Annotation re #4 Civil Cover Sheet : Parties to disregard docket entry. Document inadvertently filed in the wrong case. Document have been filed in the correct case. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 [DISREGARD ENTRY]Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) Modified on 8/16/2021 see 8/16/21 Docket Annotation below(PXS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Tab King, Inc., #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Dynamic Game Development, Inc., #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant Nathan Freels)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Summons Issued as to Dynamic Game Development, Inc., Nathan Freels, Powerhouse Gaming, Inc., Tab King, Inc. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Robinson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 Receipt #097--3117501.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 13)(Robinson, Jeffrey) Modified on 8/16/2021 to add receipt info (PXS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
