Mills v. Kijakazi
| Chad Mills |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2021cv00268 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Timothy M Burgess |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chad Mills. Kilolo Kijakazi served on 1/14/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #2 Summons Executed on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region X, SSA)(Chermol, David)
|
|
Filing 7
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due w/in 60 days of initial appearance; opening brief due w/in 30 days; answering brief due w/in 30 days; reply w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on 1/26/2022. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #7 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Marie Constance Scheperle on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Scheperle, Marie)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S NOTICE re #4 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David F. Chermol, at docket #4 , is authorized under D.Ak. LR 83.1(d). (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney David F. Chermol. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $250.00 paid. Receipt number 097--3182737.) by Chad Mills. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Certificate of Good Standing)(Chermol, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Unissued summons re Defendant Office of the Regional Cheif Counsel, Region X, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet. (Chermol, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 097--3175848.), filed by Chad Mills.(Chermol, David)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region X U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (PXS, COURT STAFF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mills v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chad Mills | |
| Represented By: | David F. Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Marie Constance Scheperle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
