Blakeley v. Gunderson et al
| Barry Blakeley |
| Daniel G. Gunderson, Christopher Rafferty, Timothy Wolff and Thomas V. Jamgochian |
| 3:2022cv00035 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE by Barry Blakeley. Christopher Rafferty served on 4/12/2022, answer due 5/3/2022. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Daniel G. Gunderson, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Christopher Rafferty, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Thomas V. Jamgochian, #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant Timothy Wolff)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Summons Issued as to Daniel G. Gunderson, Thomas V. Jamgochian, Christopher Rafferty, Timothy Wolff. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant Daniel G. Gunderson, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Christopher Rafferty, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Timothy Wolff, #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant Thomas V. Jamgochian)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel G. Gunderson, Thomas V. Jamgochian, Christopher Rafferty, Timothy Wolff (Filing fee $402/Receipt #ANC018756.), filed by Barry Blakeley.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
