McDermott v. Miller et al
Daniel Josef McDermott |
Wayne Miller, Ron Hayes, Quinn Nardini and Walter E. Gilmour |
3:2022cv00046 |
March 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Sharon L Gleason |
Scott A Oravec |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION Asking This Court To Screen The Second Lawsuit Before Screening This One Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Daniel Josef McDermott.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6 MOTION Asking This Court To Serve Each Defendant A Summons and Complaint by Daniel Josef McDermott.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5 SLG TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to D.Ak.LMR 2, this case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Scott A. Oravec for all pretrial proceedings and dispositive recommendations. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Miller, (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Daniel Josef McDermott. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 Prisoner's complaint Under the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Walter E. Gilmour, Ron Hayes, Wayne Miller, and Quinn Nardini, filed by Daniel Josef McDermott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.